The new grass cutting regime on the glebe fields at Goatee beach, Eling is being hailed a spectacular success by local councillor David Harrison.

In the past, Totton Town Council used to cut the grass all to the same length. However, this prompted complaints from people who wanted to use the area for recreational reasons, often picnickers who wanted to play impromptu games of cricket, rounders or football, (because the grass was often allowed to grow a bit too long).

Nowadays, council employees allow large areas at the back of the glebe fields to grow long grass, but cut other areas more frequently. Long serving Councillor David Harrison is delighted with the result. He says “Every one is a winner under this new cutting regime. The sporting types get better facilities whilst amongst the longer grass, all sorts of wildflowers are becoming established. In time, this will also help attract more wildlife, including butterflies and birds.

Councillor Harrison says “This new grass cutting policy is a great success. I’m hoping that we can extend the idea to other areas where there are still some green still spaces left in the town”.

Eling Wharf in Totton throws up some serious challenges. It is an employment site, but somewhat under utilised. The main access is via The High Street, a source of great irritation for those living in the area who have to suffer the noise and vibration from HGV movements at all times of the day and night.

Worse than this though, is the growing evidence that much of the land is seriously contaminated by chemicals and poisonous metals. It could be so bad that it might just be too expensive to put right, making the land permanently blighted as a potential residential area. I understand that construction on the site may not be possible because any piling might release poisonous metals into the nearby Eling Quay.

I understand that a report to the Cabinet at New Forest District Council will be making recommendations in July this year. For my part, I think that robust legal action should be taken against all potential culprits, the companies who used this site when this contamination occurred. I would not be unduly surprised if all the different companies deny responsibility. However, it should not be too hard to work out which businesses were likely to have used which chemicals and sue all of them, leaving a judge or negotiations to determine how liability is shared.

The true loss to the community may run into millions of pounds, either through the safe disposal of contaminated material (if that is possible) or the blighting of a potential prime site for housing.

Asda Stores Ltd have resubmitted a fresh planning application to New Forest District Council. The mammoth retailer wants to expand the Maynard Road Store in Totton by 1,250 square metres. It involves construction of a single storey deck car-park to accommodate more car parking spaces.

I am opposed to the application and am disappointed that some of my fellow District Council colleagues take a different view.

There are two really important reasons why Asda should not be given the permission to go ahead with their expansion plans.

Firstly, it must be clear to anyone who knows Totton that the store has pretty much sucked all of the retail business out of the town. Very few of the smaller shops have managed to compete with Asda and the massive advantage it has of a large central location and bulk buying power. Asda used to be purely a food retailer. However, as it has extended the range of items it sells, most of the smaller businesses have lost trade and have either gone bust or really struggle to survive. I don’t think it would be good for Totton if all we have left is one superstore with estate agents and a handful of charity shops.

Secondly, there is the issue of air quality. The Store itself adjoins an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA), in Junction Road. The District Council has a legal duty to monitor and take effective action to reduce pollution in the area which arises because of exhaust emissions from traffic. It must be very clear that permitting more car-parking and attracting more traffic to the area will only worsen the situation. Furthermore, it is actually a corporate objective of New Forest District Council to reduce pollution and improve air quality, (something some of the local conservative Councillors seem to have forgotten)!

Asda are, of course, offering a few “carrots” in the hope of gaining permission, including the planting of a few trees, a £89,770 contribution towards highway improvements and the promise of additional jobs. Sorry guys…… I’m not Anti-Asda but this isn’t a plan that would benefit Totton. As a locally elected Councillor, I need to judge these things on what is best for the town as a whole.

Demolition of the old incinerator at Marchwood has been delayed once again. This time, it is as a result of a kestrel nest discovered on the structure.

Local people will be very glad to see the back of the building, often described as the ugliest building in Hampshire. Unfortunately, the promised demolition of the building has been delayed several times and for different reasons.

Re-development of the site had previously been hampered by discovery that the land is contaminated. The proposed replacement building, a waste transfer station had to be re-designed. Further delays arose as a result of the entire project being re-tendered.

The latest set back will have delayed demolition for several weeks and will result in further costs to local taxpayers.

Councillor David Harrison, Hampshire County Councillor for Marchwood, has expressed frustration at the recent turn of events. He says “I have been pushing for demolition of this building for several years. I could not have anticipated this latest delay. Annoyed as I am, I did have to smile when I saw that the building is guarded by a company called Kestrel Security. I didn’t imagine that the company would use real birds!"

A great many people in my home town of Totton have expressed a keen interest in finding out what went wrong when Hampshire County Council decided to spruce up Rumbridge Street.

It’s a subject that is close to my heart because I live very close by and know a lot of the shopkeepers and residents. I was elected to represent the area as the local Hampshire County Councillor in 2004, a while after a public consultation had taken place and the decision was made to proceed with the project.

You don’t have to have lived or worked in Rumbridge Street to know that a great deal went wrong with the project. The first phase started off in 2005 using contractors, Balfour Beatty. Later work was undertaken by another contractor, Mildren Construction.

The work took a very great longer time than was originally planned. It went grossly over-budget and the quality of the materials used was downgraded and some elements of the plan, (including a one-way system which routed traffic through Winsor Road) were dropped altogether.

I was not alone in my amazement that a lot of the initial work involved smartening up the road surface with expensive materials such as cobbled stone. No work was undertaken to sort out the 100 year-old drainage system underneath which had failed long ago. Indeed, I remember telling this to a representative of Atkins who designed the scheme, at the public consultation session in 2004. My comment had obviously been ignored or forgotten and it was no surprise to me to see that Rumbridge Street suffered from quite severe flooding after the initial work to the road surface had been carried out.

It really pained me to witness, some weeks later, the expensive enhancements being dug up in order to sort out the drainage problems underneath. It was a massive waste of taxpayer’s money and resulted in long delays and frustration for local people, visitors and particular the people who were struggling to run businesses in the area.

To be fair, as with any engineering project, there were also a number of unexpected challenges, including uncharted services and old, redundant services that were only discovered when work was underway. It must have been quite difficult to co-ordinate all the various utility companies and their contractors.

However, I fear that the project management was not what it should have been, evidenced by other howlers including the wrong sort of soil delivered (all the way from Scotland), used in landscaped areas, only to find it wasn’t suitable and plants couldn’t grow in it and contractors placing their plant and equipment on newly planted areas, completely ruining it.

The scheme was completed over a year ago now. I have pressed for a local inquiry into what went wrong, not so as to blame people but so that lessons might be learned and similar mistakes be avoided in the future. The nearest I have got is an internal review, carried out by HCC Officers, which acknowledges some of the difficulties but concludes that the project was “Successful, on time and within budget”.

Some of you reading this may think that this conclusion is a bit of a whitewash, that those responsible have not been held to account, that there is every danger that lessons have not been learnt.

I have ensured that a copy of the review report has been sent to my colleagues at Totton & Eling Town Council for consideration. I’m pretty sure they will not be too impressed with it.

I was invited to do the honours at a special Open Day at Marchwood Power Station this weekend. Richard Holman, the General Manager, asked me to say a few words at the opening ceremony before the “Marchwood Power” flag was raised to much applause.

The £380 million facility is fully operational, with just 45 staff employed at the plant, I had the opportunity to meet employees, including the Finance Director and those working in IT. I then joined others on a tour of the plant. It is so big!

As it happened, the English Football team were due to kick off their World Cup campaign later that day. Richard explained that the guys operating the plant were expecting a surge in demand for electricity, especially at half-time (when people boil kettles and flush toilets). Beyond expected surges in demand, they are constantly monitoring the system and can usually respond within a ten second timeframe.

The project to build this gas fired power station is viewed as a major success, with very few “hiccups” along the way. Through good communication channels with the public (including the liaison panel that I chaired), it was possible to construct and go operational without any great anxiety from the local community. Hopefully, they will enjoy the benefits of this important energy supply for years to come.

This week, my local MP, Dr Julian Lewis, asked the following question to the Leader of the House of Commons:

“May we have a reaffirmation by health Ministers of the statement made in opposition that fluoridation would not be imposed on Southampton and Totton without the approval of the majority of the people concerned, given that South Central strategic health authority has put aside £400,000 to fight a court case, despite opposition to fluoridation from 72% of the community?”

George Young (Leader of the House of Commons, House of Commons; North West Hampshire, Conservative) replied

“The coalition Government have no plans at this stage to change the legislation under which the health authority is proceeding with its plans to add fluoride to the water in Southampton and the surrounding district. My constituency verges on that district, and I am aware of the strong local feelings and the unhappiness among some people about the consultation exercise that was undertaken before the decision was made to go ahead. However, I would mislead my hon. Friend if I said that we were planning to do anything in the short term to change the legislative framework in which the decisions are made.”

I believe most local people will feel very let down by this announcement. During the general election campaign, much political capital was made by condemning the Labour party for allowing the Strategic Health Authority to impose this on our community. Now, when in power, with the opportunity to stop it happening, it’s a different story. Small wonder politicians are held in deep mistrust. People will be justified in thinking they have been cheated.

Hampshire County Councillor, David Harrison, a leading critic of plans to add fluoride to tap water, has proposed a direct plea to the new national coalition government, to intervene and shelve the plans.

At a meeting of the powerful Hampshire County Council Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee, it was reported to members that the South Central Strategic Health Authority has declined to accept advice that the plans be dropped.

Liberal Democrat County Councillor, David Harrison (Member for Totton South and Marchwood), proposed that the Chairman of the Committee write to the new Health Minister, Andrew Lansley MP, requesting him to intervene and stop the measures from going ahead.

Councillor Harrison said “It is disgraceful that this unelected, unaccountable body has ignored the outcome of its’ own consultation, the wishes of elected representatives, including Parish, District and County Councillors as well as MP’s. They must be stopped from wasting further sums of public money on something that is not needed and clearly not wanted”.

The committee agreed to accept the proposal put forward by Councillor Harrison and remains united in opposition to the plans to add fluoride to tap water.