• Meeting About Marchwood Waste Plans
Thursday, January 14, 2010, 11:19p.m. -
• NewsPosted by Administrator
This week, I had an important meeting with Cllr. Mel Kendal, the Executive Member for the Environment on Hampshire County Council, Mr Paul Archer, Assistant Director for Environmental Services and Barrie Foley, Chief Executive of the New Forest National Park Authority.
Both Barrie and I are very concerned about the potential for increases in HGV movements in the New Forest, particularly in the Marchwood area which has a number of facilities all of which generate the type of traffic that prompt complaints about noise and vibration nuisance, as well as safety concerns.
Prior to the meeting, I had been tipped off that Hampshire County Council were secretly commissioning reports which are looking at the possibility of increasing the capacity of the Marchwood ERF (The Dome) and also the possibility of transforming the facility into a combined heat and power plant (with the idea of providing hot water to homes in Southampton).
I also know that the authority has changed the conditions attaching to the three Hampshire ERF’s, so that they can now handle waste materials brought in from outside Hampshire.
Furthermore, there is a strong possibility that Hampshire County Council will move into the business of processing commercial waste, even though it is not a statutory responsibility.
Clearly, all these things have the potential to increase HGV movements in Marchwood. For this reason, I have ruffled a few feathers by submitting a Freedom of Information Request, asking to see any of the Consultants reports. The request has been formally turned down. I’m still considering some sort of legal action, but agreed to discuss with Cllr. Kendal and Mr Archer, if only to hear what they had to say.
We were told that the reports are being kept under wraps because the work isn’t yet finished and involves commercially sensitive material, such as possible land acquisitions. To my surprise, Cllr. Kendal told me that neither he or Mr Archer have seen the reports.
When I asked why the reports were being commissioned, the reason offered was that there is a strong possibility that new waste disposal facilities are likely to be constructed elsewhere in Hampshire. Of course, there is likely going to be opposition to this and a matter that an Inspector will have to decide upon. The Inspector will want to see that alternative methods of dealing with waste have been considered, (such as increasing the capacity of the Marchwood facility) and at this point, the reports will be disclosed.
We were assured that the problem of existing heavy concentrations of HGV traffic in Marchwood are fully appreciated and that there is no intention to worsen the situation.
The possibility of barging waste into Marchwood is being looked at, although requires co-operation from Southampton City Council.
The recent changes in conditions to the Marchwood ERF, allowing it to handle waste from outside the county will, we were told, mean no extra HGV movements in the area. I asked how robust the figures were and was assured that they are constantly monitored, both by Veolia through their own monitoring and tracking systems, also annually independently monitored. The number of HGV movements will be supplied to the Marchwood ERF Liaison meetings (that I attend).
Cllr. Kendal told us that he thought it unlikely that the Marchwood ERF would ever be converted so that it could incorporate a third line (increasing its’ capacity), simply because of the technical difficulties and cost. As to the possibility of it being converted into a combined heat and plant (CHP) facility, it is being considered but by no means certain as the business case hasn’t yet been made.
Similarly, there isn’t yet a business case for the County Council to get involved in the processing of commercial waste. Cllr. Kendal mentioned that he had recently dined with the Secretary of State, Hilary Benn MP who was very keen that local authorities get involved in this business. He added that some other local authorities had already successfully started such initiatives.
I made the point that I have been consistently opposing any proposals that might lead to an increase in HGV movements on Marchwood (indeed that very day I was making a deputation to the Regulatory Committee against continued quarry activity). I wanted to know, as soon as possible of any plans that might lead to the possibility. I also said that was keen for Marchwood to receive some compensation, by way of facilities, to reflect the fact that it suffers the consequences of so much HGV traffic. I referred particularly the possibility of safe a footway and cycle route.
Mr Archer thought it likely that a cycle route might be constructed as part of the quarry restoration works. I replied that I would be very pleased if this was so. We all acknowledged that there are a number to hurdles to be overcome, such as issues of land ownership.
I brought up my wish that the Household Waste Recycling Facility be converted into a split level facility (thus avoiding the need for people to climb up and down metal steps to deposit their waste). Mr Archer confirmed that this was still a possibility, that work on this is still underway and I would be informed.
Barrie and I were offered the chance to visit the Veolia Transport depot, to look at and learn about the fleet. We are likely to take up the opportunity shortly.